Breach & attack simulation that proves your defenses work.
WoneShield Range is breach-and-attack simulation and security validation: generate realistic, labeled attacks mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, run them against your detections, and get a coverage scorecard — so you prove your defenses work, continuously.
Built for detection & purple teams · mapped to MITRE ATT&CK
Why security validation
Owning a tool isn't the same as being covered.
You assume coverage you can't prove
You own an EDR and a SIEM — but would they actually catch a real intrusion today? Assumed coverage is the most expensive kind.
Detections drift silently
A rule gets disabled, a log source breaks, a tuning change slips through — and your coverage quietly degrades until an attacker finds the gap.
Red teams are rare and point-in-time
An annual pen test or red-team is a snapshot. The other 51 weeks, you're flying on faith.
Assumed vs proven
The gap between 'we have an EDR' and 'we catch attacks.'
Coverage you can measure
Turn 'are we covered?' into a number — with a gap list.
Range runs labeled ATT&CK techniques against your live detections and scores exactly what was caught, what was missed, and what drifted — so detection engineering knows precisely where to work.
- ✓Per-technique caught / missed scoring
- ✓Detection-drift caught continuously
- ✓Safe synthetic telemetry — no real malware
How Range works
Generate. Run. Score. Close the gap.
A continuous loop that drives your detection coverage up over time.
- 1
Generate
Produce realistic, labeled attack telemetry mapped to MITRE ATT&CK — safe, synthetic, and covering the techniques that matter to you.
- 2
Run
Replay the attacks against your live detections (Argus, Aegis and third-party tools) — safely, on a schedule.
- 3
Score
Get a coverage scorecard: which techniques were caught, which were missed, and where detections silently drifted.
- 4
Close the gap
Hand missed techniques to detection engineering, re-test, and watch coverage climb — continuously, not once a year.
MITRE ATT&CK coverage
Your real coverage, technique by technique.
Range measures detection coverage across the ATT&CK matrix and shows exactly where the gaps are — then re-tests as you close them.
Architecture
Safe simulation, real measurement.
Synthetic, labeled telemetry — no live malware; self-hostable for full data residency.
Capabilities
Validate, measure, improve — on a loop.
How it compares
Red teams snapshot. Point tools test. Range proves continuously.
| Annual red team | BAS point tool | WoneShield Range | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous (not point-in-time) | — | Scheduled | ✓ |
| MITRE ATT&CK coverage scorecard | Manual | ✓ | ✓ |
| Detection-drift alerting | — | Rare | ✓ |
| Validates your platform natively | — | Generic | ✓ |
| Privacy-safe synthetic datasets | — | — | ✓ |
| Self-host / data sovereignty | N/A | Rare | ✓ |
Integrations
Validates the detections you already run.
Why Range
Stop assuming. Start measuring.
Proof, not faith
Range turns 'we have an EDR' into 'we catch these 94% of ATT&CK techniques, and here are the gaps.'
Continuous, not annual
Run validation on a schedule so detection drift is caught in days, not discovered during a breach.
Safe by design
Synthetic, labeled telemetry means realistic testing with no risk to production and no real malware.
Part of one platform
Range validates Argus and Aegis natively, and its labeled data trains the platform's AI detections.
See it in action
Watch a coverage scorecard build in two minutes.
Range runs a set of ATT&CK techniques against live detections, scores each as caught or missed, flags a drifted rule, and hands the gaps to detection engineering — live.
- ✓Labeled ATT&CK simulation
- ✓Caught vs missed scorecard
- ✓Drift detection in action
By design
Coverage you can put a number on.
Return on investment
The detection gap you don't know about is the costly one.
Validating the security spend you already have — and catching silent drift — is far cheaper than the breach a gap lets through.
Better together
Range keeps the platform honest.
It continuously proves — and improves — the rest of WoneShield:
Use cases
What Range proves.
“Range proved our 'fully covered' stack actually missed 30% of tested techniques — including a drifted lateral-movement rule. We closed the gaps and lifted measured coverage to 94% in a month.”
What detection teams say
Coverage they can finally prove.
“Range proved our 'fully covered' EDR missed 30% of the techniques we tested. We closed the gaps and re-scored within a week.”
Nathan ColeDetection Engineering Lead · SaaS“Continuous validation caught a disabled rule that left lateral-movement detection blind. We'd never have known until a breach.”
Aria DemirSOC Manager · Fintech“We finally have a coverage number for the board — and a trend line that goes up every quarter.”
Patrick NwosuCISO · Banking“Safe synthetic telemetry meant we could test ransomware techniques in production without a second thought.”
Lara FischerSecurity Engineer · Healthcare“It validates our EDR and our SIEM in one scorecard. No more arguing about which tool 'should' have caught it.”
Hassan AliPurple Team Lead · Telecom“The labeled datasets became training data for our AI detections. Validation and improvement in one loop.”
Ingrid OlsenML Security Lead · Insurance“Range proved our 'fully covered' EDR missed 30% of the techniques we tested. We closed the gaps and re-scored within a week.”
Nathan ColeDetection Engineering Lead · SaaS“Continuous validation caught a disabled rule that left lateral-movement detection blind. We'd never have known until a breach.”
Aria DemirSOC Manager · Fintech“We finally have a coverage number for the board — and a trend line that goes up every quarter.”
Patrick NwosuCISO · Banking“Safe synthetic telemetry meant we could test ransomware techniques in production without a second thought.”
Lara FischerSecurity Engineer · Healthcare“It validates our EDR and our SIEM in one scorecard. No more arguing about which tool 'should' have caught it.”
Hassan AliPurple Team Lead · Telecom“The labeled datasets became training data for our AI detections. Validation and improvement in one loop.”
Ingrid OlsenML Security Lead · InsuranceThe basics
What is BAS — and why not just a red team?
Breach-and-attack simulation (BAS) safely and continuously runs real attack techniques against your environment to measure whether your detections and controls catch them — automated, repeatable security validation.
A red team or pen test is invaluable but point-in-time and expensive. BAS runs all year, so you measure coverage continuously and catch the detection drift that silently opens gaps between engagements.
- BAS vs red team
- Red team = manual, point-in-time; BAS = automated, continuous, repeatable.
- BAS vs vulnerability scanning
- Scanning finds weaknesses; BAS tests whether you'd detect an attacker exploiting them.
Resources
Go deeper.
Pricing
Cheaper than the breach a blind spot lets through.
Priced by scope, billed annually. Multi-team, sovereign and at-scale deployments are priced to your environment — talk to sales.
- ✓BAS mapped to MITRE ATT&CK
- ✓Coverage scorecards (caught vs missed)
- ✓Safe synthetic telemetry
- ✓Validates Argus & Aegis
- ✓Standard support
- ✓Everything in Core
- ✓Scheduled continuous validation
- ✓Detection-drift alerting
- ✓Privacy-safe synthetic datasets
- ✓Third-party tool validation
- ✓Purple-team workflows
- ✓Everything in Pro
- ✓Self-host / data residency
- ✓Custom technique libraries
- ✓AI detection training pipelines
- ✓Dedicated validation engineering
Pairs with Argus (XDR) and Aegis (EDR) for native validation. Volume discounts available at scale.
Free download
Detection Coverage Self-Assessment
A practical worksheet to gauge your real MITRE ATT&CK coverage — and the techniques most teams silently miss.
Start without disruption
Only validating once a year with a red team?
Range runs safe, continuous simulations against your existing detections, gives you a coverage scorecard in hours, and keeps measuring — no production risk, no waiting for next year's engagement.
FAQ
BAS & security validation, answered.
What is breach-and-attack simulation (BAS)?+
BAS continuously and safely simulates real attack techniques against your environment to measure whether your detections and controls actually catch them. It's automated, repeatable security validation — the continuous complement to a point-in-time red team.
How is Range different from a penetration test or red team?+
A pen test or red team is a manual, point-in-time engagement. Range runs automated, labeled simulations continuously, so you measure coverage and catch detection drift every week — not once a year.
Is it safe to run in production?+
Yes. Range uses safe, synthetic, labeled attack telemetry — not live malware — so you get realistic validation without risk to production systems or data.
What does the coverage scorecard show?+
For each MITRE ATT&CK tactic and technique, the scorecard shows whether your detections caught it, missed it, or degraded since last run — turning 'do we have coverage?' into a measurable number with a gap list.
Does it validate third-party tools too?+
Yes — Range validates WoneShield Argus and Aegis natively, and can test third-party EDR/SIEM detections as well, giving you one coverage picture across your stack.
How much does WoneShield Range (BAS) cost?+
Range starts at $2,000/month (Core) and $5,000/month for Pro (continuous validation, drift alerting and synthetic datasets), with custom Enterprise pricing for large or multi-team environments.
No-risk evaluation
Get a real coverage scorecard — free.
Run a set of ATT&CK simulations against your detections and see your measured coverage and gaps, with our team alongside. Safe synthetic telemetry, no production risk.
See your real detection coverage
Start with a free assessment, or get a guided demo tailored to your stack.